Living trusts, wills, asset protection and business planning California lawyer at your fingertips!

Contact Us

4935 Hillsdale Circle, Suite 400, El Dorado Hills, CA 95762

Monday - Friday, 9am - 6pm PST; CLOSED on weekends and observed holidays.

Call Us 24/7: 8002851140

Follow Us

Phone us now.

Intellectual Property (IP) Succession in California

Intellectual property (IP) is a critical asset for many individuals and businesses. Ensuring the smooth transition of IP ownership is essential for protecting the value of these assets and maintaining their benefits for future generations. In this article, we will discuss the best way to plan the succession of intellectual property in California, using real-life examples and references to relevant case law.

Identifying Intellectual Property Assets

The first step in planning the succession of IP assets is to identify and catalog all relevant IP, including patents, trademarks, copyrights, and trade secrets. An IP audit can help uncover any unregistered or underutilized assets, as well as determine the current ownership status of each asset. It’s essential to keep detailed records, including registration numbers, filing dates, and expiration dates for patents, trademarks, and copyrights.

Estate Planning Considerations

When planning the succession of IP assets, it’s important to consider how these assets will be treated under California law. In California, IP assets are considered property and can be transferred through a will or trust. An experienced estate planning attorney can help ensure that IP assets are properly identified and included in an estate plan.

Wills and Trusts

Including IP assets in a will or trust can provide clear instructions on how these assets should be managed and distributed upon the owner’s death. A trust can offer additional benefits, such as avoiding probate and maintaining privacy. Trusts can also provide for the ongoing management of IP assets by a designated trustee.

Beneficiary Designations

Beneficiaries should be carefully chosen to ensure they have the knowledge and resources to manage the IP assets effectively. In some cases, it may be appropriate to designate a professional trustee or IP management company as the beneficiary.

III. Real Stories

Estate of Martin Luther King Jr. (2014)

In the Estate of Martin Luther King Jr., the heirs of the civil rights leader were involved in a dispute over the ownership of his copyrighted speeches and other materials.

Estate of Marilyn Monroe (2012)

In the Estate of Marilyn Monroe, the California courts ruled that the actress’s right of publicity did not survive her death, as she was domiciled in New York at the time of her passing. This case underscores the importance of understanding the applicable state law when planning the succession of IP assets, particularly in cases involving the right of publicity.

Estate of James Brown (2008)

The estate of legendary musician James Brown faced a multitude of legal challenges, including disputes over the ownership and management of his intellectual property rights. Brown’s will did not adequately address the distribution and management of his extensive music catalog, leading to years of litigation and conflict among his heirs. This example highlights the importance of having a comprehensive estate plan that clearly defines the management and distribution of intellectual property assets.

Estate of Prince (2016)

The sudden death of iconic musician Prince in 2016 left no will or estate plan in place, leading to a complex and protracted legal battle among his heirs. As a result, the distribution and management of Prince’s intellectual property rights, including copyrights and trademarks, became a contentious issue. The lack of a clear succession plan for Prince’s valuable IP assets serves as a cautionary tale for the importance of proactive estate planning.

Siegel v. Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc. (2013)

In Siegel v. Warner Bros., the heirs of Superman co-creator Jerry Siegel sought to reclaim the copyright to the famous superhero. Under U.S. copyright law, authors or their heirs have the right to terminate a copyright grant and reclaim the rights after a certain period. This case demonstrates the importance of understanding the legal framework governing the succession of IP rights and the potential complexities that can arise when transferring or reclaiming these rights.

Klinger v. Conan Doyle Estate Ltd. (2014)

In Klinger v. Conan Doyle Estate Ltd., a U.S. federal court ruled that the copyright on certain elements of the Sherlock Holmes character created by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle had expired, meaning they were in the public domain. However, other elements from later stories remained protected by copyright. This case illustrates the complexities of managing IP assets with varying terms of protection and emphasizes the need for proper succession planning to ensure the preservation and exploitation of valuable IP rights.

The examples and case law discussed above demonstrate the potential challenges and complexities associated with the succession of intellectual property rights. In order to safeguard the value and benefits of IP assets, it is crucial to engage in proactive estate planning, including the identification and cataloging of IP assets, the creation of wills and trusts, and the designation of knowledgeable beneficiaries and trustees. Consulting with experienced estate planning attorneys and intellectual property specialists can help ensure that your IP assets are protected and passed on according to your wishes.